Last week, I saw two movies. Cash and Gandhi, My Father.
Anyone who knows me would have a good idea of how I would trash Cash, so I won't go there. Enough said that I was dragged to the show and even managed a small nap in between.
Gandhi, my father is definitely a flawed attempt. Great idea but the execution could have been better.
First, the bone structure of the series of conflicts could have been given the flesh of some character development beyond the scope of the conflict. Imagine watching a movie on Gandhi with no Nehru, no
Jinnah, no Patel.
Harilal's fall could have been shown more gradually. He appears as an inebriated beard-sporting Muslim, re-converted clean-
shaven Aryan
Samajist and a wild, bearded inebriated beggar in successive scenes.
Second, yes
Akshaye Khanna was good
blahblahblah. But such intense
roles require trained actors. I have always argued that why tolerate a B grade actor when you wouldn't want anyone less than a maestro in other performing arts of this scale.
Bollywood has lowered our standards of expectations so much
that one-trick ponies (a trick he could never repeat beyond English August) like
Rahul Bose are claiming to be thespians! Acting is not about tones only, there are layers and layers of undertones.
Akshay has acted well in depicting the effect of a mahatma father in his life but the undertones of his own academics shortcomings, inability to execute and
wagairah wagairah are not etched out so well.
3. Lastly, the background music is very uninspiring. In a movie which is explicitly not about the Mahatma in India( remember the missing
Nehrus and
Jinnahs?) but the father who had to be a Mahatma, the music could have drawn inspiration from quarters other than the expected
Vaishnav jan. It might not be Beethoven, but
RDB Shakti did a far better job!
All said and done, the effort is commendable and the movie worth going.
Given me 10 "Gandhi, my father"s for every Cash!