Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Monty Python: Novel Writing reported Live

Listen to Michael's excellent imitation of live sports commentator.



Transcript

Novel Writing (Live From Wessex)


Anouncer:And now it's time for Novel Writing, which today come from the west country on Dorset.
Commentator:Hello, and welcome to Dorchester, where a very good crowd has turned out to watch local boy Thomas Hardy write his new novel "The Return Of The Native", on this very pleasant July morning. This will be his eleventh novel and the fifth of the very popular Wessex novels, and here he comes! Here comes Hardy, walking out towards his desk. He looks confident, he looks relaxed, very much the man in form, as he acknowledges this very good natured bank holliday crowd. And the crowd goes quiet now, as Hardy settles himself down at the desk, body straight, shoulders relaxed, pen held lightly but firmly in the right hand. He dips the pen...in the ink, and he's off! It's the first word, but it's not a word - oh, no! - it's a doodle. Way up on the top of the lefthand margin is a piece of meaningless scribble - and he's signed his name underneath it! Oh dear, what a disapointing start. But his off again - and here he goes - the first word of Thomas Hardy's new novel, at ten thirtyfive on this very lovely morning, it's three letters, it's the definite article, and it's "The". Dennis.
Dennis:Well, this is true to form, no surprises there. He started five of his eleven novels to date with the definite article. We had two of them with "It", there's been one "But", two "At"s, one "On" and a "Dolores", but that of course was never published.
Commentator:I'm sorry to interrupt you there, Dennis, but he's crossed it out. Thomas Hardy, here on the first day of his new novel, has crossed out the only word he has written so far, and he's gazing off into space. Oh, ohh, there he signed his name again.
Dennis:It looks like "Tess of the D'Urbervilles" all over again.
Commentator:But he's...no, he's down again and writting, Dennis, he's written "B" again, he's crossed it out again, and he has written "A" - and there is a second word coming up straight away, and it's "Sat" - "A Sat" - doesn't make sense - "A Satur" - "A Saturday" - it's "A Saturday", and the crowd are loving it, they are really enjoying this novel. And it's "afternoon", it's "Saturday afternoon", a comfortable beginning, and he's straight on to the next word - it's "in" - "A Saturday afternoon in" - "in" - "in" "in Nov" - "November" - November is spelled wrong, he's left out the second "E", but he's not going back, it looks like he's going for the sentence, and it's the first verb coming up - it's the first verb of the novel, and it's "was", and the crowd are going wild! "A Saturday afternoon in November was", and a long word here - "appro" - "appro" - is it a "approving"? - no, it's "approaching" - "approaching" - "A Saturday afternoon in November was approaching" - and he's done the definite article "but" again. And he's writing fluently, easily with flurring strokes of the pen, as he comes up to the middle of this first sentence. And with this eleventh novel well underway, and the prospects of a good days writing ahead, back to the studio.

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Dalrymple on Jaipur Lit Fest

http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2010/jan/17/my-week-william-dalrymple

...
et it is amazing how incapable literary geniuses can be of the simplest activities such as arriving at an airport in time or catching connecting flights. Applying for visas and filling in forms seems to be a particular problem for men and women who effortlessly win Nobel, Booker and Pulitzer prizes. Each year, at least two or three forget to apply at all, throwing the whole festival into confusion.
...

One of the things people like best about Jaipur is that we are completely egalitarian. There are no reserved spaces for grandees, no green room or specially roped enclosure for our authors – they mingle with the crowds and eat with them on a first-come, first-served basis. Salman Rushdie, who made his first public appearance in India since the publication of The Satanic Verses, as well as Bollywood stars such as Aamir Khan and Amitabh Bachchan, have all mixed in the crowds without bodyguards or VIP enclosures. In as hierarchical a country as India, this is all rather radical.

...

t is this egalitarian ethic that excites the Indian press much more than the literary aspect of the festival. Last year, there was a flurry of press when Vikram was seen eating on the ground as there was no space for him on any of the dining tables, and when one senior Indian literary editor found herself joining the queue for the ladies behind Tina Brown.

But the biggest excitement of the last year was when an Australian volunteer usher rather peremptorily asked two beautiful young women to move out of the aisle as they were blocking an exit, apparently unaware that the women in question were the adored Bollywood goddess Nandita Das and Julia Roberts. To their great credit, both women moved immediately and without complaint.


Saturday, January 30, 2010

Story in two sentences

I love you.
But.

Earlier stories.

Rains again

K leans over the balcony railing, watching something. ‘There are pigeons sleeping there’, he points to the top of the balcony down below. We watch them over cigarettes and he rolls his parathas in his hand and munches them thoughtfully. A clap of thunder follows a lightening tearing the dark sky like a thin old cloth. We stub our cigarettes and sign off for the day. I go to sleep, K to his book.


I wake up at three to a steady drumming noise outside – the slash of the rain on the glass door to the balcony. I heave myself from the bed and my feet find the slippers. I pull away the curtain, and pull the sliding glass-door slightly ajar – even at this height, I can smell the wet earth below. The curtain gently billows with the wind that sneaks in through the crack. I strip naked, leave the slippers inside, and walk into the balcony. I stand holding the railing, my eyes closed against the rain.


‘Why does it rain?’, I ask Ba looking at the dark clouds as we take shelter under the tin shed.

‘To make us wet, buddhoo! What else?’, she laughs.


I feel the water rise against my ankle. I gingerly move towards the switch on the balcony light, switch it on with a short jab from the finger and look towards the drain, and find a rag blocking it. I remove it and lay it over the railing, and the water level recedes. I switch the light off, go back to the railing, and close my eyes again to the warm rivulets tracing their streams from my hair to the hollow roundness around my eyes to the mounts of my cheeks to the nape of my neck to my torso to my legs.


‘We all have our own memories of the rain’, she tells me as we watch the rains sitting on the steps of the front door, our bare feet getting wet, ‘It’s like the moon – we don’t share it with everyone like we share the sun – it speaks to each of us differently.’ She pauses and the rain drums louder on the leaves. ‘Every monsoon which comes reawakens a joy in me. But it’s always a little sadder than before.’ The rains fall harder and we pull our feet in. She hugs her shins and rests her chin on the valley of her knees. ‘I wonder why’, she whispers.


The orange glow behind my eyelids from the sudden glare of the bulb darkens to a purple and slowly blacks out.

Because it reminds us of what we’ve lost.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Vidya Balan is dying...


Mile Sure - The original

Watched it after decades. Genius.



Phir Mile Sur

Great Bong has beaten me to a piece on the Phir Mile Sur video that has been released as an attempt in making the masterpiece “Mile sur mera tumhara” relevant to a generation twenty years ahead. I had attempted a similar piece but filed it away. Anyway, GB’s piece is much more hilarious a spoof I could have ever drafted. Much of the punchlines are predictable and very much the same themes I was picking on, for example, Abhishek tagging along wife and paa. (We think the same thoughts; only package them differently and flourish them forth like we had cooked it all ourselves; and them we hop to other blogs and read the same tired clichés and simmer – Hey! I had thought of that first!) Though his paradaa-faash on the Zoom TV angle was an eye-opener and explained a lot. The point is not GB, whose wit I am confessedly a fan of, but… something else.

I used to watch Mile Sur when I was a small town kid and really pretty naïve and idealistic, prone to believe anything I saw and read. It was, perhaps, a time; a generation. I was too young to realise the skill that had so deftly captured that simplicity. I remember but that my favourite portion was the fingers of Louis Banks on the keyboard (I have not seen the video for more than a decade) and the booming big B, flanked by Mithun and Jeetendra. J

That the new Mile Sur is almost entirely cramped with Bollywood, even to the depths of Shahid Kapoor, to the exclusion of even giants, I am not surprised. It is, in that sense, a very keen reflection of the present times. In fact, I liked some bits of it. Salman’s portion with mute kids touched me and I only wished he had left his baniyaan persona for a moment and worn a shirt at least, if not something more traditional, as, for me, appearing in a tribute like this demands a respect like standing at the national anthem, where personas of machismo and casualness have to be temporarily deferred. (For the same reason we refrain from tapori language among elders.)

Why I chose to not post the piece that I wrote was that I felt there was a bigger essence, of a loss, that words could not do justice too. Especially nit-picking humour recycling the same done-to-death bits.

The loss is not a loss of a time, but an aesthetic. More than that – a sensibility. I write this deliberately not watching the original video surely there on youtube, but relying on what I remember. (Education is what you remember after you’ve forgotten what you learnt. In that sense, memories can be a truer source of essence.)

I wonder if the video really needed to be made contemporary. Of course, not because they say it (the motive was the same which inspires any two-bit artist to do a tribute to a classic, Jessica Simpson’s “Boots are mode for walking” for instance, to borrow authentic glory for self-promotion). But, just seriously. I perhaps knew Zaakir Hussain and Kamal Hassan in the montages preceding the trio from Bollywood mentioned, including the heroines and Lata, but the video still affected me. Would it have made a difference if it had all been artists I would never have known the name of? No. I would have still intuitively grasped that they are all essentially and deep-rootedly Indian.

But then, I come from a generation which has seen a transition. In the video, I can see that subtle crowding out of ordinary Indian people and the really intelligentsia with bhaands, the faux poignancy and simplicity, but is there a generation that has been denied that yardstick? But what did we have that was denied? My generation jokes about how vividly they remember a Campa Cola sip (park behind GPO in small plastic cups in evening with Chicky at my side), how we had one toy we broke, repaired, broke, and things we didn’t have.

So what has been denied to the new generation? This very denial?

Or is this the same I-studied-under-street-lamps romanticism we got that we we got that we are throwing back to the next one?

But surely, the absence of silence, and simplicity, even in a post-modernistic meaningless world of simulacra, images flashing atop each other, sound bytes clambering upon eachotherblahblah is still felt. Do not we still welcome that silence between the intakes of breaths of a yakking idiot? Does silence have to be taught now? An absence, dignified and stating more hence.


Or is this mindless generation that ChetanBhagat and ZoomTVs and ShahidKs lay claim to only a minority? A simmering majority lie unexpressed below? If not, I shudder.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

What lies beneath

Last month in Kashmir, as our shikhara drifted from Char Chinar, I clicked a few parting snaps. By mistake, I kept overexposing these succession of snaps and I find the result far more beautiful than what would have come on the correct exposure.

Posting these snaps on fb, somebody remarked on the second snap that the true essence and colours are held beneath the water than what we see over the surface. I found it very fascinating, especially since my own writing these days is centered on this idea.





Kapil Thakur Unleashed




For those who don’t know, Rediff’s star spotting section is the nemesis of celebrityhood. Of the many flashes that accompany the mega-hyped celebrities, a snap sent to Rediff can rip apart the doe-caught-in-the-flashlight star, especially in the first few hours of moderated comments. Sample these “moderated” comments on the Kapoor clan sisters above.

Now it seems, rediff does not seem to need other celebrities, since it’s created a monster of its own. Kapil Thakur. In the last one month, Kapil has hogged the Spotted space and, for the first time, relieved the poor stars of the heat of anonymous unmoderated comments as there is only one question in every forum where his snap appears: Who the F*** is KAPIL?




All comments from Rediff.



Sources:





Crowd Image: http://www.caicca.ca/images/crowd1.gif



http://movies.rediff.com/report/2009/dec/31/spotted-karisma-kapoor.htm



http://movies.rediff.com/report/2010/jan/27/spotted-kareena-kapoor.htm



http://movies.rediff.com/report/2009/dec/24/spotted-abhishek-bachchan.htm



http://movies.rediff.com/report/2009/dec/30/spotted-john-abraham.htm



http://cricket.rediff.com/report/2010/jan/04/spotted-dhoni.htm



http://movies.rediff.com/report/2010/jan/07/spotted-kangna-ranaut.htm



http://cricket.rediff.com/report/2010/jan/20/spotted-yuvraj.htm



Monday, January 25, 2010

Wanted:The Review

I am surprised to find that most reviewers have dismissed Wanted as an action masala belonging to the golden era of the eighties – Rajesh Khanna, Dharmendra, Jeetendra in their prime, dancing, beating people to pulp and weeping over raped sisters even before the usher has pointed your designated deathchairs with his steel torch. The movie starts with the sound of gunshots and blood splattering on the screen, the hero makes his entry in a basement warehouse reminiscent of Big B’s Deewar sequence and beats them in a fashion jo maanav kalpana se pare hai, unfunny spoofs crowd upon each other, the chief comedian’s punchline is his obese physique and his hilariously impossible desire for the heroine (who carries more weight on her front than the comedian on his entire frame) and one of the gags involves the shlokas – “Teri ma ki choobeep, teri ma ka bhonbeep”.

Honestly, does this sound to you anyway like a cheap masala flick? It’s obvious that the critics have missed the heavy symbolism hidden in the folds, as manifold as the folds on Ayesha’s love handle.




The movie starts in the fashion of a Bhansali period drama: a woman kick boxing sequence with roaring East Asians around and a Bihari Don (a bloated Abhishek Bachchan) watching the proceedings. The don is the character Dawood has based his life on and is now on his way back to Mumbai. A brief sequence follows the narrative of Company then: a Mohanlalesque honest cop arriving in Mumbailand with the resolve of cleaning it of its filth – the Shahid Kapoors and Dino Moreas– but is advised to start small and then told about the evil Bihari migrant workers who threaten to take the cake from the mouths of the Manoos who just by virtue of being born in a place now deserve to have them all and eat them too, even though if others have baked it. Montages from Company are quickly shown to refresh our memories.

The cop immediately pulls away a lowly officer from his duty patrolling the waters outside Gateway of India to the task of protecting Mumbai from a greater threat than a bunch of strafing terrorists – Bihari workers. For that purpose, the hero has been given a double O to take out any Bihari eking out a living. He hangs around with a bunch of peons at Churchgate, Andheri stations, taxi stands staring stiffly ahead all the time but with excellent peripheral vision. Immediately, the cop lays a trap to encounter a bunch of workers who have just landed at Virar and induces them into an abandoned PSU factory, with showering sparks and molten metal but abandoned by the striking workers, with that old North India weakness – supari.


Now, the run-up to this introductory sequence is MCed by the head peon, a puffy Indra Kumar who once, along with Armaan Kohli, defined the rank bottom of Indian hero type, with “Abe, woh Rambo ka baap hai, Terminator ka chacha hai, Rocky ka dadu hai, Bruce Lee ka nana hai, Last Action Hero hai woh!” And then surprise o’ surprise, emerges from the shadows not Tusshaar Kappor but Raj. Not the Malhotra one, but the Nunnu Thackrey, played by Salman, the inspiration evident in the announcement by the faux rappers: “Super Killer Demented, Momma says he’s Wanted!" Raj then proceeds to stamp his “Immigration Denied” seal on the poor bunch of workers in the manner of South Indian Action flicks.

Tired from a day’s work here, he steps outside to get some fresh air where about a thousand Manoos wait to garland him and do what they used to do in the workless halcyon days – taking out Ganpatis and dancing on the roads to synchronised PT steps – before the migrants came and made their gaan fatis. [A note here: Watching Prabhu Deva and Govinda dance together was a history-being-made moment only a diehard masala fan can understand.]

And then he goes back to lolling around the stations waiting for the next batch of the desperate migrants masquerading as the mafia, and Prabhuji keeps spewing truckloads of them every time Raj disposes of a battalion of them while filing his nails. And that is every fifteen minutes into the movie.


Enter Uddhav, played by who else but Mahesh Manjrekar as a corrupt cop, who remains surprisingly restrained and hence just a million decibels over the top. Uddhav is in the same business as Raj – killing Biharis at random – and indeed their territories, and constituencies, might have never overlapped had not the case of the Bihari baloonwaali fallen in both their laps.




Now the gubbarewali was not always a gubbarewali. As the brilliant transcripts accompanying my CD suggest here, she started as a weatherman (sorry – weatherperson) who gets thrown out of her TV show because of her excellent English. Forced to rely on her wits, an impossible task on any day, she becomes a vendor of balloons but does not know enough of Marathi to get a license to sell her wares and has to carry them around under her clothes while pretending to work in a BPO. Indeed, the balloons become twin symbols for her ethnic and sexist stereotyping. In a scene when trapped in a hot lift (full of delicate romantic moments reminiscent of Mere Mehboob like when the heroine sits between the hero’s crotch and asks what is vibrating and he answers – my cell phone) the hero blows air in her mouth and just as he asks her to blow him in her turn, the doors of the lift part.


A lot of critics have unfairly panned Ayesha’s role saying her presence in the movie is as good as a chair with two cushions. I disagree on two counts. First, a doormat would be a better home furnished example. Second, the symbolism embodied in her character is difficult to understand for the unsubtle. Branded for her English, gender and ethnicity, the heroine carries the painful burden of this hate on her chest courageously; her immense onus suggested only in delicately framed shots like these.

You might say that Ayesha is the script of the movie. Had it not been for her the movie would have been endless streams of Bihari workers, deprived of their rakhwala trapped in the Big Boss house, massacred at the station by Raj and Uddhav.The introduction of Ayesha introduces the very dilemma Ralph Fiennes faced as a concentration camp officer in Schindler’s list – the temptation of the gubbares of someone you have been taught to blindly hate.


In all, Ayesha propels the movie with four scenes along.



1. First, she goes to an aerobic run by Vinod Khanna to pretend that the only secret to her bloated top is a fine fitness regimen and no balloons.

While returning she runs into and gets groped by Uddhav or some Bihari goons (In fact, Uddhav is so desparate that he even threatens to rape the heroine’s lighter-by-quintals mother! – another definite first in Hindi cinema)

2. Second, she summons Raj through her irritating and fat Maggi brother with a mobile


3. Raj turns up and stamps his double OOs

4. Fourth, when Salman turns to her and wants to move to the other O with her, she weeps copiously and engages in philosophical dialogues with him like here where she questions the preconditions of affection thus, “Jisse bas logon ki jaan lena aataa hai, woh kisee ki feelings ko kya samjhega!” All Raj can do is look desperately bored and checking her balloons with his amazing peripheral vision and wishing she was peddling grapes and he could just walk away.







These four scenes run endlessly in a loop and indeed threaten to do so forever till, fortuitously, two things happen. Vinod Khanna dies and the gym closes. And then, Raj kills all the Biharis, and even Uddhav, who could have molested the heroine. And the picture ends thus abruptly – a bare-chested Raj (I seriously thought that after a decade I might be able to survive a Salman flick with seeing his shaved nipples but no – the villains had to throw Molotov cocktails at his shirt) heaving over the corpse of Uddhav and staring at the camera and realising it is over. The End flashes.